Skip to content

Register now for

# YOLOv10 vs. EfficientDet: A Technical Comparison

Choosing the right object detection model is a critical decision that balances accuracy, inference speed, and computational cost. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between YOLOv10, a state-of-the-art real-time detector, and EfficientDet, a family of models known for its architectural efficiency. We will analyze their core differences, performance metrics, and ideal use cases to help you select the best model for your project, highlighting the advantages of YOLOv10 within the comprehensive Ultralytics ecosystem.

## YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Efficiency

YOLOv10, introduced by researchers from Tsinghua University in May 2024, marks a significant leap forward in real-time object detection. It is engineered for end-to-end efficiency, addressing key bottlenecks in both model architecture and post-processing to deliver exceptional speed without compromising accuracy.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, et al.
- Organization: Tsinghua University
- Date: 2024-05-23
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14458
- GitHub: https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov10/

Learn more about YOLOv10

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv10 introduces several groundbreaking innovations to redefine the speed-accuracy frontier:

- NMS-Free Training: A core feature is its ability to be trained without Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). By using consistent dual assignments, YOLOv10 eliminates the need for this post-processing step, which significantly reduces inference latency and simplifies the deployment pipeline.
- Holistic Efficiency-Accuracy Design: The model architecture was redesigned from the ground up for efficiency. This includes lightweight classification heads and spatial-channel decoupled downsampling, which reduce computational redundancy while enhancing the model's feature extraction capabilities.
- Ultralytics Ecosystem Integration: YOLOv10 is seamlessly integrated into the Ultralytics framework. This provides users with a streamlined experience, including a simple Python API, powerful CLI commands, and access to Ultralytics HUB for no-code training and deployment. This ecosystem ensures efficient training, easy access to pre-trained weights, and extensive documentation.

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- Exceptional Inference Speed: Optimized for real-time performance, making it ideal for applications requiring low latency on GPU hardware.
- End-to-End Efficiency: The NMS-free design simplifies deployment and reduces computational overhead.
- Excellent Performance Balance: Achieves state-of-the-art accuracy with fewer parameters and FLOPs compared to many competitors.
- Ease of Use: Benefits from the well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem, which simplifies everything from training to deployment.
- Lower Memory Requirements: Designed for efficient memory usage, enabling training and inference on a wider range of hardware.

Weaknesses:

- Newer Model: As a recent release, its community and third-party tool integrations are still growing compared to more established models.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLOv10's speed and efficiency make it the perfect choice for demanding, real-time applications:

- Autonomous Systems: Powering perception in self-driving cars and drones where rapid decision-making is critical.
- Robotics: Enabling fast object interaction and navigation in dynamic environments, a key aspect of AI's role in robotics.
- Edge AI: Deploying on resource-constrained devices like NVIDIA Jetson and Raspberry Pi for on-device processing.
- Real-Time Analytics: Monitoring high-traffic areas for applications like security surveillance and smart city management.

## EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Architecture

EfficientDet was introduced by the Google Brain team in 2019 as a family of scalable and efficient object detectors. Its design philosophy centers on creating a highly optimized architecture that can be scaled up or down to meet different computational budgets.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V. Le
- Organization: Google
- Date: 2019-11-20
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
- GitHub: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet

Learn more about EfficientDet

### Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet's architecture is built on three key components:

- EfficientNet Backbone: It uses the highly efficient EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction, which is known for its excellent accuracy-to-computation ratio.
- BiFPN (Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network): Instead of a standard FPN, EfficientDet uses a weighted bi-directional FPN that allows for more effective multi-scale feature fusion with fewer parameters.
- Compound Scaling: A novel scaling method that uniformly scales the depth, width, and resolution of the backbone, feature network, and prediction head. This allows the model to be scaled from the small D0 to the large D7 variant while maintaining architectural consistency.

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- High Parameter Efficiency: Excels at achieving good accuracy with a very low number of parameters and FLOPs.
- Scalability: The compound scaling method provides a clear path to trade accuracy for computational cost across a wide range of models (D0-D7).
- Strong Accuracy: Larger variants like D6 and D7 achieve high mAP scores on standard benchmarks like COCO.

Weaknesses:

- Slower Inference Speed: Despite its parameter efficiency, EfficientDet models often have higher inference latency compared to YOLO models, especially on GPUs.
- Complex Architecture: The BiFPN and compound scaling, while effective, can make the model less intuitive to modify or optimize.
- Limited Ecosystem: Lacks a unified, actively maintained ecosystem like Ultralytics, making training, deployment, and support more challenging for developers.
- Task-Specific: Primarily designed for object detection, lacking the built-in versatility for other tasks like segmentation or pose estimation found in frameworks like Ultralytics YOLOv8.

### Ideal Use Cases

EfficientDet is best suited for applications where model size and FLOPs are the most critical constraints, and real-time speed is not the primary goal:

- Cloud-Based Batch Processing: Analyzing large datasets of images where latency is not a user-facing issue.
- Academic Research: Studying model scaling laws and architectural efficiency.
- Mobile Applications: When the model must fit within very strict on-device memory limits, and some latency can be tolerated.

## Performance Head-to-Head: Speed vs. Efficiency

When comparing YOLOv10 and EfficientDet, a clear trade-off emerges between inference speed and parameter efficiency.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
YOLOv10n | 640 | 39.5 | - | 1.56 | 2.3 | 6.7
YOLOv10s | 640 | 46.7 | - | 2.66 | 7.2 | 21.6
YOLOv10m | 640 | 51.3 | - | 5.48 | 15.4 | 59.1
YOLOv10b | 640 | 52.7 | - | 6.54 | 24.4 | 92.0
YOLOv10l | 640 | 53.3 | - | 8.33 | 29.5 | 120.3
YOLOv10x | 640 | 54.4 | - | 12.2 | 56.9 | 160.4
EfficientDet-d0 | 640 | 34.6 | 10.2 | 3.92 | 3.9 | 2.54
EfficientDet-d1 | 640 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 6.1
EfficientDet-d2 | 640 | 43.0 | 17.7 | 10.92 | 8.1 | 11.0
EfficientDet-d3 | 640 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 19.59 | 12.0 | 24.9
EfficientDet-d4 | 640 | 49.7 | 42.8 | 33.55 | 20.7 | 55.2
EfficientDet-d5 | 640 | 51.5 | 72.5 | 67.86 | 33.7 | 130.0
EfficientDet-d6 | 640 | 52.6 | 92.8 | 89.29 | 51.9 | 226.0
EfficientDet-d7 | 640 | 53.7 | 122.0 | 128.07 | 51.9 | 325.0

As the table shows, YOLOv10 models consistently deliver superior performance on modern hardware. For example, YOLOv10-S achieves a 46.7 mAP with a blazing-fast latency of just 2.66 ms on a T4 GPU. In contrast, the similarly accurate EfficientDet-d3 (47.5 mAP) is over 7 times slower at 19.59 ms. This performance gap widens with larger models, making YOLOv10 the clear winner for any application where speed is a factor. While EfficientDet models show competitive CPU speeds, their GPU performance lags significantly behind the highly optimized YOLO architecture.

## Conclusion: Which Model Should You Choose?

While EfficientDet was a significant step forward in creating parameter-efficient models, YOLOv10 is the superior choice for the vast majority of modern computer vision applications. Its architecture is explicitly designed for high-speed, real-time inference on GPUs, and its end-to-end NMS-free design makes it far more practical for production deployment.

For developers and researchers, the advantages of choosing YOLOv10 within the Ultralytics ecosystem are immense:

- Ease of Use: A streamlined user experience with a simple API and extensive documentation.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Active development, strong community support, and seamless integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for MLOps.
- Performance Balance: An outstanding trade-off between speed and accuracy suitable for diverse real-world scenarios.
- Training Efficiency: Faster training times and readily available pre-trained weights to accelerate development.

If you are looking for a model that combines cutting-edge performance with unparalleled ease of use, YOLOv10 is the definitive choice. For those interested in exploring other state-of-the-art models, consider checking out the versatile Ultralytics YOLOv8 or the latest YOLO11 for even more advanced capabilities. You can also explore other comparisons, such as YOLOv10 vs. YOLOv8 or EfficientDet vs. YOLOv8, for more insights.

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments