Skip to content

Register now for

# YOLOv9 vs. DAMO-YOLO: A Technical Comparison

Choosing the right object detection model is a critical decision that balances the need for accuracy, inference speed, and computational efficiency. This page offers a detailed technical comparison between two powerful models: YOLOv9, known for its architectural innovations, and DAMO-YOLO, recognized for its speed. We will explore their architectures, performance metrics, and ideal use cases to help you select the best model for your computer vision projects.

## YOLOv9: Advanced Learning with Programmable Gradient Information

YOLOv9 represents a significant leap forward in object detection, addressing fundamental challenges of information loss in deep neural networks. Its integration into the Ultralytics ecosystem makes it not only powerful but also exceptionally accessible.

Authors: Chien-Yao Wang and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao
Organization: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Date: 2024-02-21
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13616
GitHub: https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9
Documentation: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov9/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv9 introduces two groundbreaking concepts: Programmable Gradient Information (PGI) and the Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (GELAN). PGI is designed to preserve complete input information for the loss function, mitigating the information bottleneck problem that often degrades the performance of deep networks. GELAN is a novel, highly efficient network architecture that optimizes parameter utilization and computational cost.

When implemented within the Ultralytics framework, YOLOv9's advanced architecture is combined with a suite of features designed for developers:

- Ease of Use: A streamlined user experience with a simple Python API and CLI, backed by extensive documentation.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Benefits from active development, strong community support, frequent updates, and integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for no-code training and deployment.
- Training Efficiency: Offers efficient training processes with readily available pre-trained weights and typically requires lower memory than many competing models.
- Versatility: While the original paper focuses on object detection, the repository teases capabilities for instance segmentation and panoptic segmentation, aligning with the multi-task nature of Ultralytics models.

### Strengths

- State-of-the-Art Accuracy: Achieves leading mAP scores on the COCO dataset, often outperforming other models at similar scales.
- Superior Parameter Efficiency: The GELAN architecture allows YOLOv9 to deliver high accuracy with significantly fewer parameters and FLOPs compared to many rivals.
- Information Preservation: PGI effectively tackles the information loss problem, enabling more accurate training of deeper and more complex models.
- Robust and Supported: Integration into the Ultralytics ecosystem ensures reliability, continuous improvement, and access to a wealth of resources.

### Weaknesses

- Newer Model: As a recent release, the volume of community-contributed deployment examples may still be growing, although its adoption is rapidly accelerated by the Ultralytics framework.
- Resource Needs for Large Models: The largest variant, YOLOv9-E, while highly accurate, requires substantial computational resources for training.

Learn more about YOLOv9

## DAMO-YOLO: Speed and Accuracy through Neural Architecture Search

DAMO-YOLO is a fast and accurate object detection model developed by the Alibaba Group. It leverages several modern techniques to achieve an excellent balance between speed and performance, particularly on GPU hardware.

Authors: Xianzhe Xu, Yiqi Jiang, Weihua Chen, Yilun Huang, Yuan Zhang, and Xiuyu Sun
Organization: Alibaba Group
Date: 2022-11-23
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15444
GitHub: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO

### Architecture and Key Features

DAMO-YOLO's architecture is the result of a combination of advanced techniques:

- Neural Architecture Search (NAS): Employs NAS to generate an efficient backbone network (TinyNAS).
- Efficient Neck Design: Uses an efficient RepGFPN (Generalized Feature Pyramid Network) for feature fusion.
- ZeroHead: A simplified, computationally light detection head.
- AlignedOTA: An improved label assignment strategy for more effective training.
- Distillation: Uses knowledge distillation to enhance the performance of smaller models.

### Strengths

- High Inference Speed: DAMO-YOLO is highly optimized for fast inference on GPUs, making it a strong candidate for real-time inference scenarios.
- Strong Performance: Delivers a competitive speed-accuracy trade-off, especially for its smaller variants.
- Innovative Techniques: Incorporates modern methods like NAS and advanced label assignment to push performance boundaries.
- Anchor-Free: As an anchor-free detector, it simplifies the detection pipeline by removing the need to tune anchor boxes.

### Weaknesses

- Task Specificity: Primarily designed for object detection, lacking the built-in versatility for other tasks like segmentation, pose estimation, or classification found in Ultralytics models.
- Ecosystem and Support: As a research-driven project, it lacks the comprehensive ecosystem, extensive documentation, and active community support that characterize Ultralytics models. This can make integration and troubleshooting more challenging.
- Higher Parameter Count: Compared to YOLOv9, DAMO-YOLO models often have more parameters and FLOPs to achieve similar or lower accuracy levels.

Learn more about DAMO-YOLO

## Performance Analysis: YOLOv9 vs. DAMO-YOLO

When comparing performance, YOLOv9 demonstrates a clear advantage in both accuracy and parameter efficiency. The largest model, YOLOv9-E, sets a new state-of-the-art benchmark with 55.6% mAP on COCO. Across all model sizes, YOLOv9 consistently uses fewer parameters and, in many cases, fewer FLOPs than its DAMO-YOLO counterparts to achieve higher accuracy.

While DAMO-YOLO models exhibit very fast inference speeds on NVIDIA T4 GPUs, YOLOv9 remains highly competitive, especially when considering its superior accuracy and efficiency. For example, YOLOv9-C is slightly faster than DAMO-YOLO-L while being significantly more accurate (53.0 vs. 50.8 mAP) and using far fewer parameters (25.3M vs. 42.1M).

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
YOLOv9t | 640 | 38.3 | - | 2.3 | 2.0 | 7.7
YOLOv9s | 640 | 46.8 | - | 3.54 | 7.1 | 26.4
YOLOv9m | 640 | 51.4 | - | 6.43 | 20.0 | 76.3
YOLOv9c | 640 | 53.0 | - | 7.16 | 25.3 | 102.1
YOLOv9e | 640 | 55.6 | - | 16.77 | 57.3 | 189.0
DAMO-YOLOt | 640 | 42.0 | - | 2.32 | 8.5 | 18.1
DAMO-YOLOs | 640 | 46.0 | - | 3.45 | 16.3 | 37.8
DAMO-YOLOm | 640 | 49.2 | - | 5.09 | 28.2 | 61.8
DAMO-YOLOl | 640 | 50.8 | - | 7.18 | 42.1 | 97.3

## Ideal Use Cases

### YOLOv9

YOLOv9 is the ideal choice for applications where accuracy and efficiency are paramount. Its ability to deliver state-of-the-art results with fewer parameters makes it perfect for:

- High-Precision Systems: Applications in autonomous driving, medical image analysis, and industrial quality control.
- Resource-Constrained Deployment: Smaller YOLOv9 variants are excellent for edge AI devices where computational resources are limited but high performance is still required.
- Multi-Task Solutions: Projects that may expand to include segmentation or other vision tasks benefit from the versatile foundation provided by the Ultralytics ecosystem.
- Research and Development: Its innovative architecture provides a strong baseline for researchers exploring new frontiers in deep learning.

### DAMO-YOLO

DAMO-YOLO excels in scenarios where maximizing GPU throughput is the primary goal and the application is strictly focused on object detection.

- High-Throughput Video Analytics: Cloud-based services that process a large number of video streams simultaneously.
- Real-Time GPU Applications: Systems where raw inference speed on a GPU is the most critical metric, and slight trade-offs in accuracy are acceptable.

## Conclusion: Why YOLOv9 is the Recommended Choice

While DAMO-YOLO is a formidable object detector with impressive GPU speeds, Ultralytics YOLOv9 emerges as the superior and more practical choice for the vast majority of developers and researchers.

YOLOv9 not only achieves higher accuracy but does so with greater parameter efficiency. This translates to models that are smaller, computationally cheaper, and easier to deploy. The true differentiating factor, however, is the Ultralytics ecosystem. By choosing YOLOv9, you gain access to a well-maintained, fully integrated platform that simplifies every step of the MLOps lifecycle—from data annotation and training to deployment and monitoring. The combination of top-tier performance, ease of use, multi-task versatility, and robust support makes YOLOv9 the most effective and reliable solution for building advanced computer vision applications.

## Explore Other Models

If you are interested in how DAMO-YOLO compares to other state-of-the-art models, check out these other comparisons in our documentation:

- YOLOv8 vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLO11 vs. DAMO-YOLO
- RT-DETR vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLOX vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLOv10 vs. DAMO-YOLO

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments