Skip to content

Register now for

# EfficientDet vs. YOLOv10: A Technical Comparison

Selecting the optimal object detection model is a critical decision that balances accuracy, inference speed, and computational cost. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between EfficientDet and YOLOv10, two influential models in computer vision. We will analyze their architectures, performance metrics, and ideal use cases to help you choose the best model for your project, with a special focus on the advantages offered by YOLOv10 within the Ultralytics ecosystem.

## EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Architecture

EfficientDet was introduced by the Google Brain team as a family of highly efficient and scalable object detectors. Its core innovation was a systematic approach to model scaling, aiming to optimize both accuracy and efficiency across a wide range of computational budgets.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V. Le
- Organization: Google
- Date: 2019-11-20
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
- GitHub: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet

### Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet's architecture is built on three key components:

- EfficientNet Backbone: It uses the highly efficient EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction, which was itself designed using a neural architecture search.
- BiFPN (Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network): A novel feature network that allows for easy and fast multi-scale feature fusion. Unlike traditional FPNs, BiFPN has bidirectional cross-scale connections and uses weighted feature fusion to learn the importance of different input features.
- Compound Scaling: A unique scaling method that uniformly scales the depth, width, and resolution for the backbone, feature network, and prediction head simultaneously using a simple compound coefficient. This ensures a balanced and optimized architecture at any scale.

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- Excellent Scalability: The compound scaling method provides a clear path to scale the model up or down (from EfficientDet-D0 to D7) to meet different resource constraints.
- Parameter and FLOP Efficiency: At the time of its release, it set new standards for efficiency, achieving high accuracy with fewer parameters and FLOPs than previous detectors.

Weaknesses:

- Age and Performance: While foundational, the architecture is several years old. Newer models like YOLOv10 have surpassed it in both speed and the accuracy-efficiency trade-off, especially on modern hardware like GPUs.
- Ecosystem and Maintenance: The original repository is not as actively maintained as more recent alternatives. It lacks the comprehensive ecosystem, extensive documentation, and community support found with Ultralytics models.
- Task Versatility: EfficientDet is designed specifically for object detection and does not natively support other tasks like instance segmentation or pose estimation.

### Ideal Use Cases

EfficientDet is still a relevant model for scenarios where FLOPs and parameter count are the absolute primary constraints.

- Resource-Constrained Hardware: Its smaller variants are suitable for deployment on devices with limited computational power where every FLOP counts.
- Academic Benchmarking: It serves as a strong baseline for research into model efficiency and architectural design.

Learn more about EfficientDet

## YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Detection

Ultralytics YOLOv10 is a state-of-the-art, real-time object detector from Tsinghua University. It pushes the boundaries of performance by introducing architectural innovations that reduce computational redundancy and eliminate the need for Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), enabling true end-to-end detection.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, et al.
- Organization: Tsinghua University
- Date: 2024-05-23
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14458
- GitHub: https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov10/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv10's design focuses on holistic efficiency and accuracy.

- NMS-Free Training: It employs consistent dual assignments for labels during training, which allows it to achieve competitive performance without requiring NMS during post-processing. This significantly reduces inference latency and simplifies deployment.
- Holistic Efficiency-Accuracy Design: The model architecture is optimized from end to end. This includes a lightweight classification head to reduce computational overhead and spatial-channel decoupled downsampling to preserve rich feature information more efficiently.
- Ultralytics Ecosystem Integration: YOLOv10 is seamlessly integrated into the Ultralytics framework, benefiting from a streamlined user experience, simple Python and CLI interfaces, efficient training processes, and readily available pre-trained weights.

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- State-of-the-Art Performance: Delivers an exceptional balance of speed and accuracy, often outperforming older models like EfficientDet by a large margin in real-world latency.
- End-to-End Deployment: The NMS-free design makes it truly end-to-end, which is a significant advantage for real-time inference.
- Ease of Use: As part of the Ultralytics ecosystem, YOLOv10 is incredibly easy to use. Developers can train, validate, and deploy models with just a few lines of code.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Benefits from active development, a strong open-source community, frequent updates, and integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for seamless MLOps.
- Memory Efficiency: YOLOv10 models are designed for efficient memory usage, often requiring less CUDA memory during training and inference compared to other complex architectures.

Weaknesses:

- Task Specialization: Like EfficientDet, YOLOv10 is primarily focused on object detection. For projects requiring multi-task capabilities, a model like Ultralytics YOLOv8 might be more suitable as it supports segmentation, classification, and pose estimation in a unified framework.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLOv10 excels in applications where speed and efficiency are critical.

- Real-Time Applications: Its low latency makes it perfect for autonomous systems, robotics, and high-speed video surveillance.
- Edge AI: The smaller variants (YOLOv10n, YOLOv10s) are highly optimized for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices like the NVIDIA Jetson and Raspberry Pi.
- Industrial Automation: Ideal for quality control on production lines, where fast and accurate detection is needed to keep pace with manufacturing processes.

Learn more about YOLOv10

## Performance Analysis: Speed, Accuracy, and Efficiency

The performance comparison between EfficientDet and YOLOv10 highlights the rapid advancements in model architecture and optimization.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
EfficientDet-d0 | 640 | 34.6 | 10.2 | 3.92 | 3.9 | 2.54
EfficientDet-d1 | 640 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 6.1
EfficientDet-d2 | 640 | 43.0 | 17.7 | 10.92 | 8.1 | 11.0
EfficientDet-d3 | 640 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 19.59 | 12.0 | 24.9
EfficientDet-d4 | 640 | 49.7 | 42.8 | 33.55 | 20.7 | 55.2
EfficientDet-d5 | 640 | 51.5 | 72.5 | 67.86 | 33.7 | 130.0
EfficientDet-d6 | 640 | 52.6 | 92.8 | 89.29 | 51.9 | 226.0
EfficientDet-d7 | 640 | 53.7 | 122.0 | 128.07 | 51.9 | 325.0
YOLOv10n | 640 | 39.5 | - | 1.56 | 2.3 | 6.7
YOLOv10s | 640 | 46.7 | - | 2.66 | 7.2 | 21.6
YOLOv10m | 640 | 51.3 | - | 5.48 | 15.4 | 59.1
YOLOv10b | 640 | 52.7 | - | 6.54 | 24.4 | 92.0
YOLOv10l | 640 | 53.3 | - | 8.33 | 29.5 | 120.3
YOLOv10x | 640 | 54.4 | - | 12.2 | 56.9 | 160.4

- GPU Speed: YOLOv10 demonstrates a massive advantage in GPU latency. For example, YOLOv10-B achieves a higher mAP than EfficientDet-d6 (52.7 vs. 52.6) but is over 13 times faster on a T4 GPU with TensorRT.
- Accuracy vs. Parameters: YOLOv10 models consistently offer better accuracy for a given parameter count. YOLOv10-L surpasses EfficientDet-d7 in accuracy (53.3 vs. 53.7 is very close) while being over 10x faster and using nearly half the parameters.
- Overall Efficiency: While EfficientDet-d0 has the lowest FLOPs, YOLOv10n provides a much higher mAP (39.5 vs. 34.6) and is significantly faster on GPU with a comparable number of parameters. This shows that modern architectures like YOLOv10 provide a better practical efficiency trade-off than simply minimizing FLOPs.

## Conclusion: Which Model Should You Choose?

While EfficientDet was a pioneering model for its time, YOLOv10 is the clear winner for nearly all modern applications. It delivers superior speed and accuracy, and its end-to-end, NMS-free design is a significant advantage for real-world deployment.

For developers and researchers, the choice is made even clearer by the benefits of the Ultralytics ecosystem. YOLOv10 offers:

- Superior Performance: A better trade-off between speed and accuracy on modern hardware.
- Ease of Use: A simple, unified API for training, validation, and inference.
- A Robust Ecosystem: Access to extensive documentation, active community support, and tools like Ultralytics HUB to streamline the entire MLOps pipeline.

For projects that require more than just object detection, we recommend exploring Ultralytics YOLOv8, which provides a versatile, state-of-the-art framework for detection, segmentation, pose estimation, classification, and tracking.

## Explore Other Model Comparisons

To further inform your decision, explore other comparisons involving these and other state-of-the-art models:

- EfficientDet vs YOLOv8
- YOLOv10 vs YOLOv8
- YOLOv10 vs RT-DETR
- Explore the latest models like YOLO11 for the newest advancements from Ultralytics.

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments