Skip to content

Register now for

# RTDETRv2 vs YOLOv5: A Detailed Technical Comparison

Choosing the optimal object detection model is a critical decision for any computer vision project. The trade-offs between accuracy, speed, and computational cost define a model's suitability for a given application. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between RTDETRv2, a high-accuracy transformer-based model, and Ultralytics YOLOv5, a highly efficient and widely adopted industry standard. We will explore their architectural differences, performance benchmarks, and ideal use cases to help you make an informed choice.

## RTDETRv2: High-Accuracy Real-Time Detection Transformer

RTDETRv2 (Real-Time Detection Transformer v2) is a state-of-the-art object detector from Baidu that leverages the power of Vision Transformers to achieve high accuracy while maintaining real-time performance. It represents a significant step in bringing complex transformer architectures to practical, real-time applications.

Authors: Wenyu Lv, Yian Zhao, Qinyao Chang, Kui Huang, Guanzhong Wang, and Yi Liu
Organization: Baidu
Date: 2023-04-17 (Initial RT-DETR), 2024-07-24 (RT-DETRv2 improvements)
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08069, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17140
GitHub: https://github.com/lyuwenyu/RT-DETR/tree/main/rtdetrv2_pytorch
Docs: https://github.com/lyuwenyu/RT-DETR/tree/main/rtdetrv2_pytorch#readme

### Architecture

RTDETRv2 employs a hybrid architecture that combines the strengths of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformers.

- Backbone: A CNN (like ResNet or HGNetv2) is used for initial feature extraction, efficiently capturing low-level image features.
- Encoder-Decoder: The core of the model is a Transformer-based encoder-decoder. It uses self-attention mechanisms to process the feature maps from the backbone, allowing the model to capture global context and long-range dependencies between objects in the scene. This is particularly effective for detecting objects in complex or crowded environments.

### Strengths

- High Accuracy: The transformer architecture enables RTDETRv2 to achieve excellent mAP scores, often outperforming traditional CNN-based models on complex datasets like COCO.
- Robust Feature Extraction: By considering the entire image context, it performs well in challenging scenarios with occluded or small objects, making it suitable for applications like autonomous driving.
- Real-Time Capability: The model is optimized to deliver competitive inference speeds, especially when accelerated with tools like NVIDIA TensorRT.

### Weaknesses

- Computational Cost: Transformer-based models generally have a higher parameter count and FLOPs, demanding more significant computational resources like GPU memory and processing power.
- Training Complexity: Training RTDETRv2 can be resource-intensive and slower than training CNN-based models. It often requires significantly more CUDA memory, which can be a barrier for users with limited hardware.
- Inference Speed on CPU: While fast on high-end GPUs, its performance can be significantly slower than optimized models like YOLOv5 on CPUs or less powerful edge devices.
- Ecosystem: It lacks the extensive, unified ecosystem, tooling, and broad community support that Ultralytics provides for its YOLO models.

Learn more about RTDETRv2

## Ultralytics YOLOv5: The Established Industry Standard

Ultralytics YOLOv5, first released in 2020, quickly became an industry benchmark due to its exceptional balance of speed, accuracy, and unparalleled ease of use. Developed in PyTorch by Glenn Jocher, YOLOv5 is a mature, reliable, and highly optimized model that has been deployed in countless real-world applications.

Author: Glenn Jocher
Organization: Ultralytics
Date: 2020-06-26
GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
Documentation: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov5/

### Architecture

YOLOv5 features a classic and highly efficient CNN architecture. It uses a CSPDarknet53 backbone for feature extraction, a PANet neck for feature aggregation across different scales, and an anchor-based detection head. This design is proven to be extremely effective for real-time object detection.

### Strengths

- Exceptional Speed and Efficiency: YOLOv5 is highly optimized for fast inference on a wide range of hardware, from high-end GPUs to resource-constrained edge devices like the NVIDIA Jetson and Raspberry Pi.
- Ease of Use: Ultralytics YOLOv5 is renowned for its streamlined user experience. With a simple Python API and extensive documentation, developers can train, validate, and deploy models with minimal effort.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: YOLOv5 is backed by the robust Ultralytics ecosystem, which includes active development, a large and supportive community, frequent updates, and integrated tools like Ultralytics HUB for no-code training and deployment.
- Performance Balance: The model family (n, s, m, l, x) offers an excellent trade-off between speed and accuracy, allowing users to select the perfect model for their specific needs.
- Memory Efficiency: Compared to transformer-based models like RTDETRv2, YOLOv5 requires significantly less CUDA memory for training, making it accessible to a broader range of developers and researchers.
- Versatility: YOLOv5 supports multiple tasks, including object detection, instance segmentation, and image classification, all within a unified framework.
- Training Efficiency: The training process is fast and efficient, with readily available pre-trained weights that accelerate convergence on custom datasets.

### Weaknesses

- Accuracy on Complex Scenes: While highly accurate, YOLOv5 may be slightly outperformed by RTDETRv2 in mAP on datasets with very dense or small objects, where global context is critical.
- Anchor-Based: Its reliance on predefined anchor boxes can sometimes require extra tuning for datasets with unusual object aspect ratios, a step not needed in anchor-free detectors.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLOv5 excels in applications where speed, efficiency, and rapid development are priorities:

- Real-time Video Surveillance: Powering security alarm systems and monitoring live video feeds.
- Edge Computing: Deployment on low-power devices for applications in robotics and industrial automation.
- Mobile Applications: Its lightweight models are perfect for on-device inference on smartphones.
- Rapid Prototyping: The ease of use and fast training cycles make it ideal for quickly developing and testing new ideas.

Learn more about YOLOv5

## Performance Analysis: Speed vs. Accuracy

The primary distinction between RTDETRv2 and YOLOv5 lies in their design philosophy. RTDETRv2 prioritizes achieving the highest possible accuracy by leveraging a computationally intensive transformer architecture. In contrast, YOLOv5 is engineered for the optimal balance of speed and accuracy, making it a more practical choice for a wider array of deployment scenarios, especially on non-GPU hardware.

The table below provides a quantitative comparison on the COCO val2017 dataset. While RTDETRv2 models achieve higher mAP, YOLOv5 models, particularly the smaller variants, offer dramatically faster inference speeds, especially on CPU.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
RTDETRv2-s | 640 | 48.1 | - | 5.03 | 20 | 60
RTDETRv2-m | 640 | 51.9 | - | 7.51 | 36 | 100
RTDETRv2-l | 640 | 53.4 | - | 9.76 | 42 | 136
RTDETRv2-x | 640 | 54.3 | - | 15.03 | 76 | 259
YOLOv5n | 640 | 28.0 | 73.6 | 1.12 | 2.6 | 7.7
YOLOv5s | 640 | 37.4 | 120.7 | 1.92 | 9.1 | 24.0
YOLOv5m | 640 | 45.4 | 233.9 | 4.03 | 25.1 | 64.2
YOLOv5l | 640 | 49.0 | 408.4 | 6.61 | 53.2 | 135.0
YOLOv5x | 640 | 50.7 | 763.2 | 11.89 | 97.2 | 246.4

## Conclusion and Recommendation

Both RTDETRv2 and YOLOv5 are powerful object detection models, but they serve different needs.

RTDETRv2 is an excellent choice for applications where achieving the absolute highest accuracy is the top priority and substantial computational resources (especially high-end GPUs) are available. Its ability to understand global context makes it superior for academic benchmarks and specialized industrial tasks with complex scenes.

However, for the vast majority of real-world applications, Ultralytics YOLOv5 remains the more practical and versatile choice. Its exceptional balance of speed and accuracy, combined with its low resource requirements, makes it suitable for deployment everywhere from the cloud to the edge. The key advantages of YOLOv5—ease of use, a well-maintained ecosystem, training efficiency, and versatility—make it the go-to model for developers and researchers who need to deliver robust, high-performance solutions quickly and efficiently.

For those looking for the latest advancements built upon this strong foundation, we highly recommend exploring newer Ultralytics models like YOLOv8 and YOLO11, which offer even better performance and more features within the same user-friendly framework.

## Other Model Comparisons

If you are interested in how these models stack up against others, check out these comparison pages:

- YOLOv5 vs YOLOv8
- YOLOv5 vs YOLOv9
- RTDETR vs YOLOv8
- RTDETR vs YOLO11
- EfficientDet vs YOLOv5
- YOLOX vs YOLOv5

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments