Skip to content

Register now for

# EfficientDet vs YOLOv5: A Detailed Technical Comparison

Choosing the right object detection model is a critical decision that balances the need for accuracy, speed, and computational resources. This page provides a comprehensive technical comparison between EfficientDet, a family of models from Google known for its scalability and accuracy, and Ultralytics YOLOv5, a widely adopted model celebrated for its exceptional speed and ease of use. We will delve into their architectural differences, performance benchmarks, and ideal use cases to help you select the best model for your computer vision project.

## EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Architecture

EfficientDet was introduced by the Google Brain team as a new family of scalable and efficient object detectors. Its core innovation lies in a carefully designed architecture that optimizes for both accuracy and efficiency through compound scaling.

### Technical Details

- Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V. Le
- Organization: Google
- Date: 2019-11-20
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
- GitHub: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet
- Docs: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet#readme

### Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet's architecture is built upon three key components:

- EfficientNet Backbone: It uses the highly efficient EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction, which is already optimized for a great accuracy-to-computation ratio.
- BiFPN (Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network): For feature fusion, EfficientDet introduces BiFPN, which allows for simple and fast multi-scale feature fusion. Unlike traditional FPNs, BiFPN has bidirectional connections and uses weighted feature fusion to learn the importance of different input features.
- Compound Scaling: A novel scaling method that uniformly scales the depth, width, and resolution for the backbone, feature network, and box/class prediction networks. This allows the creation of a family of models (from D0 to D7) that cater to different resource constraints while maintaining architectural consistency.

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- High Accuracy: Larger EfficientDet models (e.g., D5-D7) can achieve state-of-the-art mAP scores, often outperforming other models in pure accuracy benchmarks.
- Parameter Efficiency: For a given level of accuracy, EfficientDet models are often more parameter- and FLOP-efficient than older architectures like Mask R-CNN.
- Scalability: The compound scaling method provides a clear path to scale the model up or down based on the target hardware and performance requirements.

Weaknesses:

- Inference Speed: While efficient for its accuracy, EfficientDet is generally slower than single-stage detectors like YOLOv5, especially on GPU. This can make it less suitable for real-time inference applications.
- Complexity: The BiFPN and compound scaling introduce a higher level of architectural complexity compared to the more straightforward design of YOLOv5.

### Ideal Use Cases

EfficientDet is an excellent choice for applications where achieving the highest possible accuracy is the primary goal, and latency is a secondary concern:

- Medical Image Analysis: Detecting subtle anomalies in medical scans where precision is paramount.
- Satellite Imagery: High-resolution analysis for applications like agriculture or environmental monitoring.
- Offline Batch Processing: Analyzing large datasets of images or videos where processing does not need to happen in real-time.

Learn more about EfficientDet

## Ultralytics YOLOv5: The Versatile and Widely-Adopted Model

Ultralytics YOLOv5 has become an industry standard, renowned for its incredible balance of speed, accuracy, and unparalleled ease of use. Developed in PyTorch, it has been a go-to model for developers and researchers looking for a practical and high-performing solution.

### Technical Details

- Author: Glenn Jocher
- Organization: Ultralytics
- Date: 2020-06-26
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov5/

### Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

- Exceptional Speed: YOLOv5 is exceptionally fast, enabling real-time object detection crucial for applications like security alarm systems.
- Ease of Use: It offers a simple training and deployment workflow, supported by excellent Ultralytics documentation and a streamlined user experience via simple Python and CLI interfaces.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: YOLOv5 benefits from active development, a large community, frequent updates, and extensive resources like tutorials and integrations with tools like Ultralytics HUB for no-code training.
- Performance Balance: The model achieves a strong trade-off between inference speed and detection accuracy, making it suitable for a wide range of real-world scenarios.
- Training Efficiency: YOLOv5 features an efficient training process with readily available pre-trained weights and generally requires lower memory for training and inference compared to more complex architectures.
- Versatility: Beyond object detection, YOLOv5 also supports instance segmentation and image classification tasks.

Weaknesses:

- Accuracy: While very accurate, YOLOv5 may not always achieve the absolute highest mAP compared to the largest EfficientDet models, especially for detecting very small objects.
- Anchor-Based Detection: It relies on pre-defined anchor boxes, which might require tuning for optimal performance on datasets with unusual object aspect ratios.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLOv5 is the preferred choice for applications where speed, efficiency, and ease of deployment are paramount:

- Real-time Video Surveillance: Rapid object detection in live video streams.
- Autonomous Systems: Low-latency perception for robotics and autonomous vehicles.
- Edge Computing: Deployment on resource-constrained devices like Raspberry Pi and NVIDIA Jetson due to model efficiency.
- Mobile Applications: Fast inference times and smaller model sizes suit mobile platforms.

Learn more about YOLOv5

## Performance Analysis: Accuracy vs. Speed

The primary trade-off between EfficientDet and YOLOv5 lies in accuracy versus speed. The table below shows that while larger EfficientDet models can achieve higher mAP scores, they do so with significantly higher latency. In contrast, YOLOv5 models offer much faster inference speeds, particularly on GPU (T4 TensorRT), making them ideal for real-time applications. For example, YOLOv5l achieves a competitive 49.0 mAP with a latency of just 6.61 ms, whereas the similarly accurate EfficientDet-d4 is over 5 times slower at 33.55 ms.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
EfficientDet-d0 | 640 | 34.6 | 10.2 | 3.92 | 3.9 | 2.54
EfficientDet-d1 | 640 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 6.1
EfficientDet-d2 | 640 | 43.0 | 17.7 | 10.92 | 8.1 | 11.0
EfficientDet-d3 | 640 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 19.59 | 12.0 | 24.9
EfficientDet-d4 | 640 | 49.7 | 42.8 | 33.55 | 20.7 | 55.2
EfficientDet-d5 | 640 | 51.5 | 72.5 | 67.86 | 33.7 | 130.0
EfficientDet-d6 | 640 | 52.6 | 92.8 | 89.29 | 51.9 | 226.0
EfficientDet-d7 | 640 | 53.7 | 122.0 | 128.07 | 51.9 | 325.0
YOLOv5n | 640 | 28.0 | 73.6 | 1.12 | 2.6 | 7.7
YOLOv5s | 640 | 37.4 | 120.7 | 1.92 | 9.1 | 24.0
YOLOv5m | 640 | 45.4 | 233.9 | 4.03 | 25.1 | 64.2
YOLOv5l | 640 | 49.0 | 408.4 | 6.61 | 53.2 | 135.0
YOLOv5x | 640 | 50.7 | 763.2 | 11.89 | 97.2 | 246.4

## Conclusion: Which Model Should You Choose?

Both EfficientDet and Ultralytics YOLOv5 are powerful object detection models, but they cater to different priorities. EfficientDet excels when maximum accuracy is the primary goal, potentially at the cost of inference speed.

Ultralytics YOLOv5, however, stands out for its exceptional balance of speed and accuracy, making it ideal for the vast majority of real-world applications. Its Ease of Use, comprehensive and Well-Maintained Ecosystem (including Ultralytics HUB), efficient training, and scalability make it a highly practical and developer-friendly choice. For projects requiring rapid deployment, real-time performance, and strong community support, YOLOv5 is often the superior option.

Users interested in exploring newer models with further advancements might also consider Ultralytics YOLOv8 or the latest YOLO11, which build upon the strengths of YOLOv5 with improved accuracy and new features. For more comparisons, visit the Ultralytics model comparison page.

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments