Skip to content

Register now for

# YOLOv5 vs YOLO11: A Technical Comparison

Choosing the right object detection model is a critical decision that balances the need for accuracy, speed, and resource efficiency. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two landmark models from Ultralytics: the widely adopted Ultralytics YOLOv5 and the state-of-the-art Ultralytics YOLO11. While YOLOv5 set an industry standard for performance and ease of use, YOLO11 represents the next evolution, offering superior accuracy, greater versatility, and enhanced efficiency within the same powerful Ultralytics ecosystem.

## Ultralytics YOLOv5: The Established Industry Standard

Released in 2020, YOLOv5 quickly became one of the most popular object detection models in the world. Its reputation is built on an exceptional combination of speed, reliability, and user-friendliness, making it a go-to choice for countless developers and researchers.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Glenn Jocher
- Organization: Ultralytics
- Date: 2020-06-26
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov5/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv5 is built on PyTorch and features a CSPDarknet53 backbone combined with a PANet neck for effective feature aggregation. Its architecture is highly scalable, offering a range of models from the small and fast YOLOv5n to the large and accurate YOLOv5x. A key characteristic of YOLOv5 is its anchor-based detection head, which was highly effective at the time of its release.

### Strengths

- Exceptional Inference Speed: YOLOv5 is highly optimized for rapid inference, making it a robust choice for real-time applications, especially on GPU hardware.
- Mature Ecosystem: As a well-established model, YOLOv5 benefits from a massive community, extensive tutorials, and broad third-party support. It is battle-tested across numerous production environments.
- Ease of Use: Renowned for its simple API and comprehensive documentation, YOLOv5 allows for rapid prototyping and deployment. The model is seamlessly integrated into the Ultralytics ecosystem, including Ultralytics HUB for no-code training.
- Training Efficiency: YOLOv5 offers an efficient training process with readily available pre-trained weights, enabling effective transfer learning and faster development cycles.

### Weaknesses

- Anchor-Based Detection: Its reliance on predefined anchor boxes can sometimes require careful tuning for datasets with unusually shaped objects, a limitation addressed by newer anchor-free detectors.
- Accuracy Ceiling: While still very accurate, its performance on benchmarks like COCO has been surpassed by more recent architectures like YOLO11.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLOv5 remains an excellent choice for applications where speed and stability are paramount:

- Edge Computing: Its smaller variants are perfect for deployment on resource-constrained devices like Raspberry Pi and NVIDIA Jetson.
- Real-Time Surveillance: Powering security systems and monitoring applications that require high FPS.
- Industrial Automation: Used for quality control and process automation in manufacturing environments.

Learn more about YOLOv5

## Ultralytics YOLO11: The Next Evolution in Vision AI

YOLO11 is the latest state-of-the-art model from Ultralytics, engineered to push the boundaries of what's possible in computer vision. It builds upon the successes of its predecessors, including YOLOv8, to deliver significant improvements in accuracy, speed, and versatility.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
- Organization: Ultralytics
- Date: 2024-09-27
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 introduces a refined network architecture with advanced feature extraction capabilities and a streamlined design. A major advancement is its anchor-free detection head, which improves generalization and simplifies the training process. This modern design allows YOLO11 to achieve higher accuracy with a more efficient use of parameters, leading to faster inference speeds and lower computational demands.

### Strengths

- State-of-the-Art Performance: YOLO11 sets a new standard for accuracy, achieving higher mAP scores than YOLOv5 across all model sizes.
- Enhanced Versatility: YOLO11 is a true multi-tasking framework, supporting object detection, instance segmentation, image classification, pose estimation, and oriented bounding boxes (OBB) within a single, unified model.
- Superior Efficiency: The model is highly efficient, offering a better speed-accuracy trade-off. Notably, it demonstrates significantly faster inference on CPUs compared to YOLOv5, making it accessible for a wider range of hardware. It also requires less memory for training and inference than many other architectures.
- Streamlined User Experience: As part of the Ultralytics ecosystem, YOLO11 maintains the same commitment to ease of use with a simple Python API, powerful CLI, and extensive documentation.

### Weaknesses

- Computational Demand for Large Models: While highly efficient, the largest YOLO11 models (e.g., YOLO11x) still require substantial computational resources to achieve maximum accuracy.
- Evolving Integrations: As a newer model, the ecosystem of third-party tools and integrations is growing rapidly but may not yet be as extensive as that for the long-established YOLOv5.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLO11 is the ideal choice for new projects that demand the highest levels of accuracy and flexibility:

- Advanced Robotics: Enabling precise object interaction and navigation in complex, dynamic environments.
- Healthcare and Medical Imaging: Supporting tasks like tumor detection where high precision is critical.
- Smart Cities: Powering sophisticated traffic management and public safety systems.
- Retail Analytics: Improving inventory management and customer behavior analysis with greater accuracy.

Learn more about YOLO11

## Performance Face-to-Face: YOLOv5 vs. YOLO11

The performance metrics clearly illustrate the advancements made with YOLO11. Across the board, YOLO11 models deliver a significant boost in mAP while maintaining or even improving inference speed. For instance, YOLO11s achieves a 47.0 mAP, which is comparable to YOLOv5l, but with far fewer parameters and significantly faster CPU inference. Similarly, YOLO11m surpasses YOLOv5x in accuracy (51.5 vs. 50.7 mAP) while being over 4 times faster on a CPU.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
YOLOv5n | 640 | 28.0 | 73.6 | 1.12 | 2.6 | 7.7
YOLOv5s | 640 | 37.4 | 120.7 | 1.92 | 9.1 | 24.0
YOLOv5m | 640 | 45.4 | 233.9 | 4.03 | 25.1 | 64.2
YOLOv5l | 640 | 49.0 | 408.4 | 6.61 | 53.2 | 135.0
YOLOv5x | 640 | 50.7 | 763.2 | 11.89 | 97.2 | 246.4
YOLO11n | 640 | 39.5 | 56.1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 6.5
YOLO11s | 640 | 47.0 | 90.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 21.5
YOLO11m | 640 | 51.5 | 183.2 | 4.7 | 20.1 | 68.0
YOLO11l | 640 | 53.4 | 238.6 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 86.9
YOLO11x | 640 | 54.7 | 462.8 | 11.3 | 56.9 | 194.9

## Conclusion: Which Model Should You Choose?

While YOLOv5 remains a solid and reliable model, YOLO11 is the clear successor and the recommended choice for nearly all new projects. It offers a substantial leap in performance, providing higher accuracy, greater task versatility, and improved efficiency without sacrificing the ease of use that made its predecessors so popular.

- Choose YOLOv5 if you are working on a legacy project that already uses it, or if your primary constraint is deploying on hardware where its specific GPU speed optimizations provide a critical advantage.

- Choose YOLO11 for any new application. Its superior accuracy, anchor-free design, multi-task capabilities, and excellent performance across both CPU and GPU make it the more powerful, flexible, and future-proof solution.

Both models are backed by the robust Ultralytics ecosystem, ensuring a smooth development experience with excellent support and documentation.

## Explore Other Model Comparisons

If you're interested in how these models stack up against other leading architectures, check out our other comparison pages:

- YOLO11 vs YOLOv8
- YOLOv8 vs YOLOv5
- YOLO11 vs YOLOv10
- YOLOv5 vs YOLOv7
- RT-DETR vs YOLOv5

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments