Skip to content

Register now for

# YOLO11 vs EfficientDet: A Detailed Technical Comparison

This page offers a detailed technical comparison between Ultralytics YOLO11 and EfficientDet, two prominent object detection models. We analyze their architectures, performance benchmarks, and suitability for different applications to assist you in selecting the optimal model for your computer vision needs. While both models aim for efficient and accurate object detection, they stem from different research lines (Ultralytics and Google) and employ distinct architectural philosophies.

## Ultralytics YOLO11

Ultralytics YOLO11 represents the latest advancement in the YOLO (You Only Look Once) series, developed by Ultralytics and known for its exceptional real-time object detection capabilities. It builds upon the success of predecessors like YOLOv8, focusing on enhancing both accuracy and computational efficiency.

Technical Details:

- Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
- Organization: Ultralytics
- Date: 2024-09-27
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 utilizes a single-stage, anchor-free architecture optimized for speed and accuracy. Key features include refined feature extraction layers and a streamlined network structure, reducing parameter count and computational load. This design ensures excellent performance across diverse hardware, from edge devices (NVIDIA Jetson, Raspberry Pi) to cloud servers.

A major advantage of YOLO11 is its versatility and integration within the Ultralytics ecosystem. It supports multiple tasks beyond object detection, including instance segmentation, image classification, pose estimation, and oriented bounding boxes (OBB). The Ultralytics framework offers a simple Python API and CLI, extensive documentation, readily available pre-trained weights, and efficient training processes with lower memory requirements compared to many other architectures. The ecosystem benefits from active development, strong community support, and seamless integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for streamlined MLOps.

### Strengths

- High Speed and Efficiency: Excellent inference speed, ideal for real-time applications.
- Strong Accuracy: Achieves state-of-the-art mAP scores across model sizes.
- Versatility: Supports detection, segmentation, classification, pose, and OBB tasks within a single framework.
- Ease of Use: Simple API, comprehensive documentation, and user-friendly ecosystem.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Actively developed, strong community, frequent updates, and tools like Ultralytics HUB.
- Training Efficiency: Faster training times and lower memory usage compared to many alternatives.
- Deployment Flexibility: Optimized for diverse hardware from edge to cloud.

### Weaknesses

- Smaller models prioritize speed, which may involve a trade-off in maximum achievable accuracy compared to the largest variants.
- As a one-stage detector, may face challenges with extremely small objects in certain complex scenes.

### Ideal Use Cases

YOLO11 excels in applications demanding real-time performance and high accuracy:

- Autonomous Systems: Robotics and self-driving cars.
- Security: Surveillance systems and theft prevention.
- Industrial Automation: Quality control and recycling efficiency.
- Retail: Inventory management and customer analytics.

Learn more about YOLO11

## Google's EfficientDet

EfficientDet is a family of object detection models introduced by the Google Brain team. It is designed to achieve high efficiency by optimizing the trade-off between accuracy and computational resources (parameters and FLOPs).

Technical Details:

- Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, Quoc V. Le
- Organization: Google
- Date: 2019-11-20
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
- GitHub: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet
- Docs: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet#readme

### Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet's architecture is built on three key innovations:

1. EfficientNet Backbone: It uses the highly efficient EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction.
2. BiFPN (Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network): A novel feature network that allows for simple and fast multi-scale feature fusion, improving upon traditional FPNs by adding weighted connections.
3. Compound Scaling: A method that uniformly scales the depth, width, and resolution for the backbone, feature network, and box/class prediction networks. This allows the model to be scaled from small (D0) to large (D7) variants to fit different resource constraints.

### Strengths

- High Parameter Efficiency: Delivers strong accuracy for a relatively low number of parameters and FLOPs.
- Scalability: The compound scaling method provides a clear path to scale the model for different performance targets.
- Strong Benchmark Performance: Achieved state-of-the-art results on the COCO dataset at the time of its release.

### Weaknesses

- Slower Inference Speed: Despite its FLOP efficiency, EfficientDet often has higher inference latency compared to YOLO models, especially on GPUs, making it less suitable for many real-time applications.
- Limited Versatility: Primarily designed for object detection and lacks the native support for other tasks like instance segmentation, pose estimation, or OBB that is integrated into the Ultralytics YOLO framework.
- Less Integrated Ecosystem: The original repository is primarily a research artifact. It lacks the comprehensive documentation, simple API, and integrated tools like Ultralytics HUB that simplify the end-to-end workflow from training to deployment.
- Framework Dependency: The official implementation is in TensorFlow, which may be a limitation for developers and researchers working primarily in the PyTorch ecosystem.

### Ideal Use Cases

EfficientDet is well-suited for scenarios where model size and theoretical computational cost are the most critical constraints:

- Edge AI: Deploying on mobile or embedded devices where memory and processing power are severely limited.
- Academic Research: Studying model scaling laws and architectural efficiency.
- Cloud Applications: Scenarios where minimizing computational cost per inference is more important than achieving the lowest possible latency.

Learn more about EfficientDet

## Performance and Benchmarks: YOLO11 vs. EfficientDet

When comparing performance, it's crucial to look beyond just mAP. While both model families offer a range of accuracy levels, YOLO11 is engineered for superior real-world speed. The table below shows that for a similar mAP, YOLO11 models are significantly faster, especially when accelerated with TensorRT on a GPU.

For example, YOLO11m achieves the same 51.5 mAP as EfficientDet-d5 but is over 14x faster on a T4 GPU (4.7 ms vs. 67.86 ms) and uses 40% fewer parameters. This highlights YOLO11's exceptional balance of accuracy, speed, and model size, making it a far more practical choice for applications requiring real-time processing.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
YOLO11n | 640 | 39.5 | 56.1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 6.5
YOLO11s | 640 | 47.0 | 90.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 21.5
YOLO11m | 640 | 51.5 | 183.2 | 4.7 | 20.1 | 68.0
YOLO11l | 640 | 53.4 | 238.6 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 86.9
YOLO11x | 640 | 54.7 | 462.8 | 11.3 | 56.9 | 194.9
EfficientDet-d0 | 640 | 34.6 | 10.2 | 3.92 | 3.9 | 2.54
EfficientDet-d1 | 640 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 6.1
EfficientDet-d2 | 640 | 43.0 | 17.7 | 10.92 | 8.1 | 11.0
EfficientDet-d3 | 640 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 19.59 | 12.0 | 24.9
EfficientDet-d4 | 640 | 49.7 | 42.8 | 33.55 | 20.7 | 55.2
EfficientDet-d5 | 640 | 51.5 | 72.5 | 67.86 | 33.7 | 130.0
EfficientDet-d6 | 640 | 52.6 | 92.8 | 89.29 | 51.9 | 226.0
EfficientDet-d7 | 640 | 53.7 | 122.0 | 128.07 | 51.9 | 325.0

## Conclusion: Which Model Should You Choose?

While EfficientDet was a significant step forward in model efficiency, Ultralytics YOLO11 represents a more modern, practical, and powerful solution for the vast majority of computer vision applications.

- Choose EfficientDet if your primary constraint is minimizing theoretical FLOPs or parameter count, and you are comfortable working within its research-oriented framework.

- Choose Ultralytics YOLO11 for nearly all other scenarios. Its superior speed-accuracy trade-off, incredible versatility across multiple vision tasks, and ease of use make it the definitive choice for developers and researchers. The well-maintained ecosystem, including comprehensive documentation, active community support, and tools like Ultralytics HUB, ensures a smooth development and deployment experience, from initial experimentation to production at scale.

## Other Model Comparisons

For further exploration, consider these comparisons involving YOLO11 and other relevant models:

- YOLO11 vs YOLOv10
- YOLO11 vs YOLOv9
- YOLO11 vs YOLOv8
- YOLO11 vs YOLOv7
- YOLO11 vs RT-DETR
- YOLOX vs EfficientDet
- YOLOv8 vs EfficientDet

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments