Skip to content

Register now for

# DAMO-YOLO vs. YOLO11: A Technical Comparison

This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two state-of-the-art object detection models: DAMO-YOLO, developed by Alibaba Group, and Ultralytics YOLO11. While both models are designed for high-performance, real-time object detection, they employ distinct architectural philosophies and excel in different areas. We will analyze their architectural differences, performance metrics, and ideal applications to help you make an informed decision for your computer vision projects.

## DAMO-YOLO

Authors: Xianzhe Xu, Yiqi Jiang, Weihua Chen, Yilun Huang, Yuan Zhang, and Xiuyu Sun
Organization: Alibaba Group
Date: 2022-11-23
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15444v2
GitHub: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO
Docs: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO/blob/master/README.md

DAMO-YOLO is a fast and accurate object detection method developed by the Alibaba Group. It introduces several novel techniques to push the performance boundaries of YOLO-style detectors. The model aims to achieve a superior balance between accuracy and latency, particularly on GPU hardware.

Learn more about DAMO-YOLO

### Architecture and Key Features

DAMO-YOLO's architecture is a combination of cutting-edge components designed to work in synergy:

- NAS-Powered Backbones: It leverages Neural Architecture Search (NAS) to generate efficient backbones (like GiraffeNet) that are optimized for specific hardware, reducing computational cost while maintaining strong feature extraction capabilities.
- Efficient RepGFPN Neck: The model incorporates an efficient neck structure based on Generalized Feature Pyramid Networks (GFPN) with re-parameterization techniques to enhance multi-scale feature fusion.
- ZeroHead: DAMO-YOLO introduces a lightweight, anchor-free detection head called ZeroHead, which decouples the classification and regression tasks and reduces computational overhead.
- AlignedOTA Label Assignment: It uses an improved label assignment strategy called AlignedOTA, which dynamically matches ground-truth objects with the most suitable predictions based on both classification and localization scores, leading to better training convergence.
- Knowledge Distillation: The training process is enhanced with knowledge distillation, where a larger, more powerful teacher model guides the training of a smaller student model to boost its final accuracy.

### Strengths

- High Accuracy on GPU: DAMO-YOLO achieves impressive mAP scores, particularly in its larger variants, demonstrating strong performance on the COCO dataset.
- Fast GPU Inference: The model is highly optimized for GPU inference, delivering low latency, which is critical for real-time applications running on dedicated graphics hardware.
- Innovative Techniques: It showcases the effectiveness of modern techniques like NAS, advanced label assignment, and distillation in object detection.

### Weaknesses

- Limited Versatility: DAMO-YOLO is primarily designed for object detection. It lacks native support for other computer vision tasks like instance segmentation, pose estimation, or classification, which are standard in frameworks like Ultralytics.
- Complex Ecosystem: The repository and documentation, while functional, are less streamlined compared to the Ultralytics ecosystem. This can present a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Hardware Focus: Its performance is heavily benchmarked on GPUs, with limited information on CPU performance, making it a less flexible choice for deployment on CPU-only or diverse edge devices.

## Ultralytics YOLO11

Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
Organization: Ultralytics
Date: 2024-09-27
GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/

Ultralytics YOLO11 is the latest evolution in the renowned YOLO (You Only Look Once) series, representing the state-of-the-art in real-time object detection and beyond. It builds upon the successes of its predecessors like YOLOv8, delivering enhanced accuracy, speed, and versatility within a mature and user-friendly ecosystem.

Learn more about YOLO11

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 features a refined single-stage, anchor-free architecture that is highly optimized for an exceptional balance of performance and efficiency. Its design focuses on streamlined feature extraction and a lightweight network structure, which reduces parameter count and computational load. This makes YOLO11 highly adaptable for deployment across a wide range of hardware, from powerful cloud servers to resource-constrained edge devices like the NVIDIA Jetson.

However, the true power of YOLO11 lies in its integration with the well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem, which provides significant advantages:

- Ease of Use: A simple Python API and a powerful CLI make training, validation, and inference incredibly straightforward. The extensive documentation provides clear guidance for users of all skill levels.
- Versatility: Unlike DAMO-YOLO, YOLO11 is a multi-task model that natively supports object detection, instance segmentation, image classification, pose estimation, and oriented bounding boxes (OBB) within a single, unified framework.
- Performance Balance: YOLO11 models offer an excellent trade-off between speed and accuracy on both CPU and GPU, ensuring flexible and efficient deployment in diverse real-world scenarios.
- Training Efficiency: The framework is optimized for fast training times and has lower memory requirements compared to more complex architectures. Readily available pre-trained weights accelerate custom training workflows.
- Robust Ecosystem: Users benefit from active development, strong community support via GitHub and Discord, frequent updates, and seamless integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for end-to-end MLOps.

### Strengths

- State-of-the-Art Performance: Achieves top-tier mAP scores with an architecture optimized for both speed and accuracy.
- Unmatched Versatility: A single model framework can handle five different vision tasks, providing a comprehensive solution for complex projects.
- Superior Usability: The streamlined API, clear documentation, and integrated ecosystem make it exceptionally easy to get started and deploy.
- Hardware Flexibility: Highly efficient on both CPU and GPU, making it suitable for a wider range of deployment targets.
- Active and Supported: Backed by a dedicated team at Ultralytics and a large, active open-source community.

### Weaknesses

- Larger models like YOLO11x require substantial computational resources, though they remain highly efficient for their performance class.

## Performance Comparison

The table below provides a head-to-head comparison of performance metrics for DAMO-YOLO and YOLO11 on the COCO val dataset.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
DAMO-YOLOt | 640 | 42.0 | - | 2.32 | 8.5 | 18.1
DAMO-YOLOs | 640 | 46.0 | - | 3.45 | 16.3 | 37.8
DAMO-YOLOm | 640 | 49.2 | - | 5.09 | 28.2 | 61.8
DAMO-YOLOl | 640 | 50.8 | - | 7.18 | 42.1 | 97.3
YOLO11n | 640 | 39.5 | 56.1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 6.5
YOLO11s | 640 | 47.0 | 90.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 21.5
YOLO11m | 640 | 51.5 | 183.2 | 4.7 | 20.1 | 68.0
YOLO11l | 640 | 53.4 | 238.6 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 86.9
YOLO11x | 640 | 54.7 | 462.8 | 11.3 | 56.9 | 194.9

From the data, we can draw several conclusions:

- Accuracy: While DAMO-YOLO is competitive, YOLO11 models, particularly the medium-to-large variants (YOLO11m, l, x), achieve higher mAP scores, with YOLO11x reaching an impressive 54.7 mAP.
- GPU Speed: DAMO-YOLO shows very competitive GPU latency. However, YOLO11 models are also highly optimized, with YOLO11n achieving the fastest GPU speed at 1.5 ms.
- CPU Speed: A critical advantage for YOLO11 is its excellent and well-documented CPU performance. The availability of CPU benchmarks makes it a reliable choice for applications where GPUs are not available. DAMO-YOLO lacks official CPU speed metrics, limiting its applicability.
- Efficiency: YOLO11 models are exceptionally efficient. For example, YOLO11l achieves a 53.4 mAP with only 25.3M parameters, outperforming DAMO-YOLOl in both accuracy and parameter efficiency. YOLO11n sets the standard for lightweight models with just 2.6M parameters.

## Conclusion and Recommendation

DAMO-YOLO is a powerful object detector that showcases impressive academic innovations and delivers strong performance on GPU hardware. It is an excellent choice for researchers exploring advanced architectural concepts or for applications deployed in GPU-rich environments where only object detection is required.

However, for the vast majority of developers, researchers, and businesses, Ultralytics YOLO11 is the clear and superior choice. It not only delivers state-of-the-art accuracy and speed but does so within a mature, easy-to-use, and incredibly versatile framework. The native support for multiple tasks, excellent performance on both CPU and GPU, and the robust ecosystem of documentation, community support, and MLOps tools like Ultralytics HUB make YOLO11 a more practical, scalable, and powerful solution for building real-world computer vision applications.

## Explore Other Models

If you are interested in how DAMO-YOLO and YOLO11 compare to other leading models, check out these other comparisons:

- RT-DETR vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLOv9 vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLOv8 vs. DAMO-YOLO
- YOLO11 vs. RT-DETR
- YOLO11 vs. YOLOv9

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments