Skip to content

Register now for

# EfficientDet vs. YOLOv9: A Technical Comparison

Choosing the optimal object detection model is critical for computer vision tasks, balancing accuracy, speed, and computational resources. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between Google's EfficientDet and Ultralytics YOLOv9, two significant models in the object detection landscape. We will delve into their architectural designs, performance benchmarks, and suitable applications to assist you in making an informed decision for your projects.

## EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Architecture

EfficientDet was introduced in 2019 by researchers at Google Research and quickly became a benchmark for efficient object detection. It proposed a family of models that could scale from lightweight, edge-compatible versions to highly accurate, cloud-based ones using a systematic compound scaling method.

- Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V. Le
- Organization: Google
- Date: 2019-11-20
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
- GitHub: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet
- Docs: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet#readme

### Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet's architecture is built on three key components:

- EfficientNet Backbone: It uses the highly efficient EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction, which was designed using a neural architecture search (NAS) to optimize for both accuracy and FLOPs.
- BiFPN (Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network): Instead of a traditional FPN, EfficientDet uses BiFPN, which allows for richer, multi-scale feature fusion with weighted connections, improving accuracy with minimal computational overhead.
- Compound Scaling: A novel method that uniformly scales the depth, width, and resolution of the backbone, feature network, and detection head. This allows the creation of a family of models (D0 to D7) that cater to different resource constraints.

### Strengths

- Scalability: The primary strength of EfficientDet is its family of models, which provides a wide range of options for different deployment targets, from mobile devices to data centers.
- Pioneering Efficiency: At the time of its release, it set a new standard for efficiency, achieving high accuracy with fewer parameters and FLOPs than competing models.

### Weaknesses

- Age and Performance: While foundational, the architecture is from 2019. Newer models like YOLOv9 have surpassed it in both speed and accuracy, especially on modern hardware like GPUs.
- Inference Speed: The larger EfficientDet models can be slow, particularly when compared to the highly optimized inference speeds of YOLO models.
- Task Specificity: EfficientDet is designed purely for object detection, lacking the built-in versatility for other tasks like instance segmentation or pose estimation found in modern frameworks.
- Ecosystem: The official repository is less focused on user experience and is not as actively maintained or supported as the comprehensive Ultralytics ecosystem.

### Use Cases

EfficientDet is still a viable option for:

- Applications where a specific trade-off point offered by one of its scaled variants (D0-D7) is a perfect fit.
- Projects that require deployment on CPUs, where its smaller models show competitive performance.
- Legacy systems where the model is already integrated and performs adequately.

Learn more about EfficientDet

## YOLOv9: State-of-the-Art Accuracy and Efficiency

Ultralytics YOLOv9, introduced in 2024 by Chien-Yao Wang and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, represents a significant advancement in real-time object detection. It addresses the challenge of information loss in deep networks through innovative architectural elements, setting new state-of-the-art benchmarks.

- Authors: Chien-Yao Wang, Hong-Yuan Mark Liao
- Organization: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
- Date: 2024-02-21
- Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13616
- GitHub: https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9
- Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov9/

### Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv9's superior performance stems from two main innovations:

- Programmable Gradient Information (PGI): This concept is designed to tackle the information bottleneck problem in deep neural networks. PGI generates reliable gradients to ensure that the model can learn complete information, leading to more accurate feature representations.
- Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (GELAN): YOLOv9 introduces GELAN, a novel and highly efficient architecture that builds upon the principles of CSPNet and ELAN. It optimizes parameter utilization and computational efficiency, allowing the model to achieve higher accuracy with fewer resources.

### Strengths

- State-of-the-art Accuracy: YOLOv9 achieves superior accuracy in object detection, outperforming competitors like EfficientDet at similar or lower parameter counts, as detailed in its paper "YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information".
- Exceptional Performance Balance: It offers an outstanding trade-off between accuracy, inference speed, and model size, making it suitable for a wide range of applications from edge AI to high-performance cloud servers.
- Ease of Use: When used within the Ultralytics framework, YOLOv9 benefits from a streamlined user experience, a simple Python API, and extensive documentation.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: The Ultralytics ecosystem provides active development, a large and supportive community, frequent updates, and integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for no-code training and MLOps.
- Training Efficiency: YOLO models typically have lower memory requirements during training compared to other architectures. The framework offers efficient training processes and readily available pre-trained weights.
- Versatility: While the original paper focuses on detection, the underlying GELAN architecture is versatile. The original repository teases support for tasks like instance segmentation and panoptic segmentation, aligning with the multi-task capabilities of other Ultralytics models like YOLOv8.

### Weaknesses

- Novelty: As a newer model, real-world deployment examples might be less numerous than for older, established models like EfficientDet, although adoption within the Ultralytics community is rapid.
- Training Resources: While computationally efficient for its performance level, training the largest YOLOv9 variants (e.g., YOLOv9-E) can still require significant computational resources.

### Use Cases

YOLOv9 is particularly well-suited for applications where accuracy and efficiency are paramount, such as:

- High-resolution image analysis, like in satellite imagery.
- Complex scene understanding required in autonomous vehicles and robotics.
- Detailed object recognition for tasks like quality control in manufacturing.

Learn more about YOLOv9

## Performance Analysis: YOLOv9 vs. EfficientDet

The following table provides a head-to-head comparison of performance metrics for various model sizes of EfficientDet and YOLOv9, benchmarked on the COCO dataset.

Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B)
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
EfficientDet-d0 | 640 | 34.6 | 10.2 | 3.92 | 3.9 | 2.54
EfficientDet-d1 | 640 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 6.1
EfficientDet-d2 | 640 | 43.0 | 17.7 | 10.92 | 8.1 | 11.0
EfficientDet-d3 | 640 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 19.59 | 12.0 | 24.9
EfficientDet-d4 | 640 | 49.7 | 42.8 | 33.55 | 20.7 | 55.2
EfficientDet-d5 | 640 | 51.5 | 72.5 | 67.86 | 33.7 | 130.0
EfficientDet-d6 | 640 | 52.6 | 92.8 | 89.29 | 51.9 | 226.0
EfficientDet-d7 | 640 | 53.7 | 122.0 | 128.07 | 51.9 | 325.0
YOLOv9t | 640 | 38.3 | - | 2.3 | 2.0 | 7.7
YOLOv9s | 640 | 46.8 | - | 3.54 | 7.1 | 26.4
YOLOv9m | 640 | 51.4 | - | 6.43 | 20.0 | 76.3
YOLOv9c | 640 | 53.0 | - | 7.16 | 25.3 | 102.1
YOLOv9e | 640 | 55.6 | - | 16.77 | 57.3 | 189.0

From the data, several key insights emerge:

- Accuracy and Efficiency: YOLOv9 consistently offers a better trade-off. For example, YOLOv9-C achieves a higher mAP (53.0) than EfficientDet-D6 (52.6) with roughly half the parameters and FLOPs.
- Inference Speed: On a modern GPU with TensorRT optimization, YOLOv9 models are significantly faster. YOLOv9-E is over 7x faster than EfficientDet-D7 while also being more accurate. Even the smallest YOLOv9t model is much faster than the smallest EfficientDet-d0.
- Resource Usage: YOLOv9 models are more parameter-efficient. YOLOv9-S (7.1M params) surpasses the accuracy of EfficientDet-D3 (12.0M params). This efficiency is crucial for deployment on resource-constrained devices.

## Conclusion and Recommendations

While EfficientDet was a groundbreaking model that pushed the boundaries of efficiency, the field of computer vision has advanced rapidly. For new projects starting today, YOLOv9 is the clear choice. It delivers state-of-the-art accuracy, superior inference speed on modern hardware, and greater computational efficiency.

The integration of YOLOv9 into the Ultralytics ecosystem further solidifies its advantage, providing developers with a user-friendly, well-supported, and versatile framework that accelerates the entire workflow from training to deployment. EfficientDet remains a historically important model and may be suitable for maintaining legacy systems, but for new, high-performance applications, YOLOv9 offers a decisive edge.

## Explore Other Models

If you are exploring different state-of-the-art models, be sure to check out our other comparison pages:

- YOLOv9 vs. YOLOv8
- YOLOv9 vs. YOLOv10
- YOLOv9 vs. RT-DETR

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

## Comments